J Ross is in Murky Waters with the council over tiny home classification.

In the rapidly growing world of tiny homes, John Ross finds himself caught in a baffling fog of misinformation. His story is emblematic of a broader confusion that plagues many who dream of downsizing into these compact dwellings. The allure of tiny homes is undeniable—minimalist living, reduced environmental footprint, and the promise of financial freedom. Yet, when it comes to regulations, the grey areas seem almost insurmountable.

Stuff.co.nz article

The Misinformation Maze

John is not alone in his predicament. Many aspiring tiny home owners are misled by the notion that these homes can easily bypass traditional housing regulations. The reality, however, is far more complex. Tiny homes often straddle the line between being classified as buildings and vehicles, leading to a myriad of legal challenges.

Most tiny homes are essentially small buildings mounted on registered trailers for transportation — not registered caravans. This distinction is crucial because it places them in a regulatory grey zone. To legally bypass building codes, a tiny home must be classified as a "drawn motor vehicle" and meet specific vehicular standards, including dimensions akin to a caravan. The confusion arises because many do not realise that simply placing a home on wheels does not automatically exempt it from being considered a building.

The man at the centre of a tiny house consenting dispute is heading to the Environment Court and says the battle is a “matter of principle”.

Taita resident Jono Voss has “fabricated” a tiny house and he says it should be considered a vehicle rather than a dwelling.

However, Hutt City Council doesn’t believe the structure should be considered a vehicle, and wants Voss to get resource and building consent for what it considers to be a building.

Voss said he was “reasonably hopeful” he would win the case, but that it was “up to the judge”.
— Stuff.co.nz

Navigating Legal Complexities

The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) in New Zealand provides guidelines to clarify what constitutes a tiny house as a building or a vehicle. The iPamp Tiny Home is a case in point. By registering as a caravan with the New Zealand Transport Authority (NZTA), it sidesteps the building classification entirely, thus exempting it from the Building Act. This strategic classification highlights the importance of understanding and adhering to local regulations.

John's situation underscores the pressing need for clarity and education around tiny home regulations. Without a solid understanding of the legal framework, many find themselves in a quagmire of council regulations and compliance issues.

The tiny house, measuring 8metres long, just over 3m wide and 4½ metres high, has been successfully registered as a trailer by the NZ Transport Agency.
— Stuff.co.nz

The issue lies not with the trailer itself but with the load it carries. A registered trailer is not the same as a caravan, which is defined as a single-drawn motor vehicle that includes both the box and the chassis.

New Zealand Transport Authority "tiny homes"

  1. A tiny home is not classed as a specialist vehicle, so to be used on the road, it must be within all the dimension limits for a standard vehicle or, if larger, transported as a load.

    1. Maximum width: 2.55 meters

    2. Maximum length: 12.5 meters; 11 meters for caravans  

    3. Gross vehicle mass: up to 3.5 tons

    4. Maximum rear overhang 4.0 meters

The Path Forward

For tiny home enthusiasts like John, the path forward involves rigorous due diligence and collaboration with local councils. Engaging with regulatory bodies early in the planning process can avert legal pitfalls. Additionally, selecting designs and builders who are well-versed in local compliance issues can make a significant difference.

John Ross's story serves as a cautionary tale for anyone considering the leap into tiny home living. It's a reminder that while the dream of a simple life is enticing, the road to achieving it is paved with legal intricacies that must be navigated with care and foresight.

Ultimately, the tiny home movement represents a powerful shift toward sustainable and minimalist living. By addressing the regulatory challenges head-on, enthusiasts can ensure that their tiny living dreams become a reality, free from the fog of confusion and legal hurdles.



Good luck, John. I can only imagine what your going through.

Previous
Previous

Motueka man in battle with council over Tiny House classification.

Next
Next

Legalities of iPamps Tiny Home classification.